Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 601625.

601
Innovative Housing Opportunities (IHO)
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
148
units
602
HPD Riverside LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
147
units
603
Highlands Property Development
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
146
units
604
Delta Community Development Corporation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
146
units
605
Housing Authority of the City of Fresno, CA
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+44 pipeline
146
units
606
Community Housing Opportunities Corporation
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+59 pipeline
143
units
607
Rico and Carol Brazil II, LP
3 projects · 1 JVs
22% JV
143
units
608
WP Valley Village LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
142
units
609
Blackbriar Development, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
142
units
610
Sacramento Mutual Housing Association
2 projects
0% JV
141
units
611
Southern California Presbyterian Homes
2 projects · 1 JVs
30% JV
141
units
612
Santa Barbara Affordable Housing Group
3 projects · 2 JVs
31% JV+47 pipeline
141
units
613
Davis Community Meals
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
141
units
614
Abode Community Housing
3 projects · 2 JVs
69% JV
140
units
615
MP Mezes, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
140
units
616
Comm. Dev. Corp.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
139
units
617
Riverside Housing Development Corporation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
139
units
618
Venice Community Housing Corporation
5 projects · 2 JVs
37% JV+194 pipeline
139
units
619
San Diego Community Housing Corporation
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+104 pipeline
139
units
620
Stony Pt. Inc.
3 projects · 1 JVs
16% JV
139
units
621
Synergy Community Development Corporation
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
138
units
622
WCH Affordable XII, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
138
units
623
Pacific Southwest Community Dev. Corp.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
136
units
624
San Diego Interfaith Housing Fnd
2 projects
0% JV
135
units
625
Community Collective, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
135
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 601625.

Innovative Housing Opportunities (IHO)
0% sole sponsor100% JV
HPD Riverside LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Highlands Property Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Delta Community Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Authority of the City of Fresno, CA
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Community Housing Opportunities Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Rico and Carol Brazil II, LP
78% sole sponsor22% JV
WP Valley Village LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Blackbriar Development, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Sacramento Mutual Housing Association
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Southern California Presbyterian Homes
70% sole sponsor30% JV
Santa Barbara Affordable Housing Group
69% sole sponsor31% JV
Davis Community Meals
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Abode Community Housing
31% sole sponsor69% JV
MP Mezes, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Comm. Dev. Corp.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Riverside Housing Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Venice Community Housing Corporation
63% sole sponsor37% JV
San Diego Community Housing Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Stony Pt. Inc.
84% sole sponsor16% JV
Synergy Community Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
WCH Affordable XII, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Pacific Southwest Community Dev. Corp.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
San Diego Interfaith Housing Fnd
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Community Collective, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.