Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 576600.

576
Edward Mackay
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
159
units
577
Villa Santa Fe Apartments MGP, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
159
units
578
Hope-Net
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
158
units
579
The Duncan Group
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
157
units
580
JB Development, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
156
units
581
480 Valencia Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
156
units
582
Figueroa Economical Housing Development Corporation
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
154
units
583
S.P.G. Housing, Inc.
4 projects · 3 JVs
89% JV
154
units
584
David Ferguson
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
154
units
585
VHJS, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
153
units
586
CFY Dev Inc
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
153
units
587
Sacramento Hsng. Auth. Repositioning Program, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
153
units
588
FFAH V Orchard Villas Apartments, LLC
2 projects · 1 JVs
47% JV
152
units
589
Bettencourt Properties, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+122 pipeline
152
units
590
GEAHI II
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
151
units
591
Highland Companies, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
151
units
592
CRCD LLC
3 projects · 2 JVs
67% JV+168 pipeline
151
units
593
Pacific Communities, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
151
units
594
Sutter Community Affordable Housing
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
150
units
595
Same as GPs above
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
150
units
596
OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER dba The People Concern
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
150
units
597
T8 Housing Partners MGP, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
149
units
598
UP Holdings California, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV+113 pipeline
149
units
599
MBA Development Corp.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
149
units
600
AMG
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
148
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 576600.

Edward Mackay
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Villa Santa Fe Apartments MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Hope-Net
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Duncan Group
0% sole sponsor100% JV
JB Development, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
480 Valencia Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Figueroa Economical Housing Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
S.P.G. Housing, Inc.
11% sole sponsor89% JV
David Ferguson
0% sole sponsor100% JV
VHJS, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
CFY Dev Inc
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Sacramento Hsng. Auth. Repositioning Program, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
FFAH V Orchard Villas Apartments, LLC
53% sole sponsor47% JV
Bettencourt Properties, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
GEAHI II
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Highland Companies, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
CRCD LLC
33% sole sponsor67% JV
Pacific Communities, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Sutter Community Affordable Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Same as GPs above
0% sole sponsor100% JV
OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER dba The People Concern
0% sole sponsor100% JV
T8 Housing Partners MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
UP Holdings California, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MBA Development Corp.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AMG
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.