Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.
Professional Housing & Development Apts (Site B)Los Angeles0 unitsJV
768
Civic Center Barrio Housing Corp
3 projects · 2 JVs
85% JV
39
units
Completed TCAC projects (3)
Park Village ApartmentsChula Vista · 202527 unitsJV
Raitt Street ApartmentsSanta Ana · 20236 unitsJV
La Gema Del BarrioSanta Ana · 20186 units
769
Pecan-Schoolhouse, Inc.
2 projects
0% JV
38
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Pecan CourtNapa · 201824 units
Schoolhouse CourtNapa · 201814 units
770
Center Housing Development, LLC c/o Success Center
2 projects · 1 JVs
28% JV
36
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Connecticut Street CourtSan Francisco · 202310 unitsJV
Minna Park Family ApartmentsSan Francisco · 201926 units
771
Esperanza Community Housing Corp.
2 projects
0% JV
26
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Alegria ApartmentsLos Angeles15 units
Budlong Avenue ApartmentsLos Angeles · 202411 units
772
Brookmore Apts. Corporation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
23
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Henderson HomesLos Angeles · 202511 unitsJV
Robinson VillaLos Angeles · 201912 unitsJV
773
PI Properties No 140 LLC
2 projects
0% JV
18
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Sunshine Financial Group IIFresno · 202314 units
Sunshine Financial Group II - DakotaFresno · 20234 units
774
IG Properties, Inc.
2 projects · 1 JVs
31% JV
16
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Vista Del Monte ApartmentsSherman Oaks · 20225 unitsJV
4334-4346 Matilija ApartmentsSherman Oaks · 201811 units
775
1755 EFM, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
0% JV
0
units
Completed TCAC projects (2)
Lexington Apartments (LA Preservation III) (Site B)Los Angeles0 unitsJV
Leeward Apartments (Site A)Los Angeles0 unitsJV
Development model breakdown
Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 751–775.
ONE Company
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Sagebrush GP LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Urban Preservation Foundation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Administrative GP, Inclusionary Housing, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
ICGP
86% sole sponsor14% JV
Palm Court Senior Homes, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Resources for Community Dev.
36% sole sponsor64% JV
Coronado Interfaith Housing Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Yurok Housing Authority
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Housing Authority of the City of Alameda
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Community Resource Talent Development
52% sole sponsor48% JV
C-Court, Inc.
60% sole sponsor40% JV
Abhay Gokani Corporation
15% sole sponsor85% JV
Central City Economic Development Corporation
62% sole sponsor38% JV
Surf Development Compnay
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Los Angeles County Housing Development Corporation
48% sole sponsor52% JV
Koreatown Youth and Community Center
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Civic Center Barrio Housing Corp
15% sole sponsor85% JV
Pecan-Schoolhouse, Inc.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Center Housing Development, LLC c/o Success Center
72% sole sponsor28% JV
Esperanza Community Housing Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Brookmore Apts. Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
PI Properties No 140 LLC
100% sole sponsor0% JV
IG Properties, Inc.
69% sole sponsor31% JV
1755 EFM, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Top cities by affordable units built
Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.
#1Los Angeles
587 projects
39,112 units
#2San Francisco
185 projects
18,181 units
#3San Jose
146 projects
17,446 units
#4Sacramento
130 projects
15,221 units
#5San Diego
150 projects
15,189 units
#6Oakland
85 projects
7,539 units
#7Fresno
65 projects
6,240 units
#8Bakersfield
54 projects
4,383 units
#9Long Beach
41 projects
4,289 units
#10Santa Rosa
50 projects
4,013 units
#11Anaheim
42 projects
3,766 units
#12Richmond
23 projects
3,323 units
Units in pipeline
Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).
Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,368
USA Multifamily Development, Inc.
2,328
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985
About this data
Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 775 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project. The headline totals (units, projects, pipeline) count each project once — JV projects are de-duplicated by TCAC application number — while the developer leaderboard credits every co-sponsor's involvement, so per-developer unit counts add up to more than the distinct statewide totals.
⚠ Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.
