Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 551575.

551
WCH Affordable I, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
170
units
552
Midtown Homes, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
170
units
553
APEC International, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
170
units
554
Rural California Housing Corp
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
169
units
555
Episcopal Housing Alliance
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
169
units
556
Corridor Economic Development Corp.
4 projects · 3 JVs
87% JV
169
units
557
Barone Galasso
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
168
units
558
Triton Community Development LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
167
units
559
Same as General Partners above
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV+78 pipeline
167
units
560
West Sacramento Housing Development Corporation, a
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
167
units
561
Capitol Area Community Development Corporation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
166
units
562
Menorah Housing Foundation
2 projects
0% JV
165
units
563
Bay Development Group, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
165
units
564
Affordable Housing Community Development Corporation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
164
units
565
Caulfield Lane Senior Housing Inc.
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
163
units
566
Davis Senior Housing Communities, Inc
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
161
units
567
National CORE of California
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
161
units
568
Affordable Housing Alliance II, Inc., dba Integrit
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
161
units
569
Howard Street Development Corporation
2 projects
0% JV
160
units
570
Mercy House CHDO, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
160
units
571
WCH Affordable LXI, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
160
units
572
Kaufman
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
160
units
573
Broad Multi-Housing Group
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
160
units
574
Burbank Housing Development Corpo
3 projects · 2 JVs
46% JV
159
units
575
2nd Story SB Development 1 LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
159
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 551575.

WCH Affordable I, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Midtown Homes, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
APEC International, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Rural California Housing Corp
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Episcopal Housing Alliance
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Corridor Economic Development Corp.
13% sole sponsor87% JV
Barone Galasso
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Triton Community Development LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Same as General Partners above
0% sole sponsor100% JV
West Sacramento Housing Development Corporation, a
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Capitol Area Community Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Menorah Housing Foundation
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Bay Development Group, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Housing Community Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Caulfield Lane Senior Housing Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Davis Senior Housing Communities, Inc
0% sole sponsor100% JV
National CORE of California
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Housing Alliance II, Inc., dba Integrit
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Howard Street Development Corporation
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Mercy House CHDO, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
WCH Affordable LXI, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Kaufman
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Broad Multi-Housing Group
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Burbank Housing Development Corpo
54% sole sponsor46% JV
2nd Story SB Development 1 LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.