Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 251275.

251
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+2,104 pipeline
522
units
252
Cyrus Youssefi
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
516
units
253
AHA MGP Los Angeles VI, LLC
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
515
units
254
SHE_CEF1 Inc.
12 projects · 9 JVs
81% JV
515
units
255
GP
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
509
units
256
West Coast Redevelopment, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
508
units
257
DFA Development
11 projects · 11 JVs
100% JV
503
units
258
AHA Inland III MGP, LLC
2 projects · 1 JVs
71% JV
499
units
259
Japanese-American Religious Federation Housing, In
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV
497
units
260
Advanced Development & Investment, Inc.
10 projects · 10 JVs
100% JV
495
units
261
PH Canyon Crest Holdings, LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV+430 pipeline
494
units
262
AHA MGP Los Angeles V, LLC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
494
units
263
MP Preservation Inc.
5 projects · 2 JVs
24% JV
494
units
264
AHA High Desert MGP, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+515 pipeline
493
units
265
WNC Community Preservation
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
491
units
266
FF Development L.P.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
490
units
267
SLSM, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
484
units
268
Housing Alternatives, Inc., a California Non Profi
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
484
units
269
Housing on Merit III LLC
4 projects · 3 JVs
86% JV
482
units
270
BRIDGE Housing Corporation - Southern California
5 projects · 1 JVs
10% JV
477
units
271
Kelley Ventures, LLC
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV+562 pipeline
476
units
272
Century Villages at Cabrillo
4 projects · 2 JVs
42% JV
475
units
273
San Luis Obispo Nonprofit Housing Corporation
13 projects · 5 JVs
37% JV+233 pipeline
475
units
274
WCH Affordable V, LLC
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV
474
units
275
Hampstead Partners Dev., Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
473
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 251275.

PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Cyrus Youssefi
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA MGP Los Angeles VI, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
SHE_CEF1 Inc.
19% sole sponsor81% JV
GP
0% sole sponsor100% JV
West Coast Redevelopment, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
DFA Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA Inland III MGP, LLC
29% sole sponsor71% JV
Japanese-American Religious Federation Housing, In
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Advanced Development & Investment, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
PH Canyon Crest Holdings, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA MGP Los Angeles V, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MP Preservation Inc.
76% sole sponsor24% JV
AHA High Desert MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
WNC Community Preservation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
FF Development L.P.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
SLSM, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Alternatives, Inc., a California Non Profi
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing on Merit III LLC
14% sole sponsor86% JV
BRIDGE Housing Corporation - Southern California
90% sole sponsor10% JV
Kelley Ventures, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Century Villages at Cabrillo
58% sole sponsor42% JV
San Luis Obispo Nonprofit Housing Corporation
63% sole sponsor37% JV
WCH Affordable V, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Hampstead Partners Dev., Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.