Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 226250.

226
Hearthstone CA Properties V, LLC
3 projects · 2 JVs
43% JV+135 pipeline
578
units
227
RCC Vintage Oaks, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
576
units
228
Johnson & Johnson Investments, LLC
12 projects · 12 JVs
100% JV+772 pipeline
572
units
229
Better Opportunities Builder
9 projects · 6 JVs
72% JV
572
units
230
AMCAL Multi-Housing, Inc.
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV+287 pipeline
572
units
231
PacH Fresno Holdings LLC
7 projects · 7 JVs
100% JV
566
units
232
CASA MAJOR AH LLC
8 projects · 4 JVs
53% JV+24 pipeline
562
units
233
AHA Orange MGP LLC
6 projects · 2 JVs
38% JV
561
units
234
American Communities, LLC
12 projects · 12 JVs
100% JV
561
units
235
Orange Housing Development Corporation
7 projects · 5 JVs
62% JV
554
units
236
Decro Corporation
10 projects · 10 JVs
100% JV+187 pipeline
552
units
237
Allied Pacific Development, LLC
7 projects · 5 JVs
64% JV
551
units
238
EBALDC
6 projects · 5 JVs
80% JV
549
units
239
Enhanced Affordable Development
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
548
units
240
Community Housing Works
7 projects · 6 JVs
81% JV
546
units
241
The Related Companies of CA
5 projects · 4 JVs
86% JV
542
units
242
Volunteers of America National Services
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
539
units
243
Eden Investments, Inc.
7 projects · 5 JVs
72% JV
539
units
244
Housing On Merit XIV, LLC
2 projects · 1 JVs
75% JV
537
units
245
Heartstone/PWC JV, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
536
units
246
MP Santa Clara, Inc.
5 projects · 2 JVs
54% JV
536
units
247
Affordable Housing USA
6 projects · 3 JVs
32% JV
533
units
248
RHAC - Valley, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
530
units
249
Valley Initiative for Affordable Housing
11 projects · 11 JVs
100% JV+63 pipeline
530
units
250
The Hampstead Group, Inc.
8 projects · 8 JVs
100% JV
524
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 226250.

Hearthstone CA Properties V, LLC
57% sole sponsor43% JV
RCC Vintage Oaks, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Johnson & Johnson Investments, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Better Opportunities Builder
28% sole sponsor72% JV
AMCAL Multi-Housing, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
PacH Fresno Holdings LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
CASA MAJOR AH LLC
47% sole sponsor53% JV
AHA Orange MGP LLC
62% sole sponsor38% JV
American Communities, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Orange Housing Development Corporation
38% sole sponsor62% JV
Decro Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Allied Pacific Development, LLC
36% sole sponsor64% JV
EBALDC
20% sole sponsor80% JV
Enhanced Affordable Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Community Housing Works
19% sole sponsor81% JV
The Related Companies of CA
14% sole sponsor86% JV
Volunteers of America National Services
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Eden Investments, Inc.
28% sole sponsor72% JV
Housing On Merit XIV, LLC
25% sole sponsor75% JV
Heartstone/PWC JV, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MP Santa Clara, Inc.
46% sole sponsor54% JV
Affordable Housing USA
68% sole sponsor32% JV
RHAC - Valley, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Valley Initiative for Affordable Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Hampstead Group, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.