Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.
Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 301–325.
The Skid Row Housing Trust
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Tabernacle Community Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
BHDC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA East Bay MGP LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
LA Family Housing
3% sole sponsor97% JV
Alcohol and Drug Awareness Program
32% sole sponsor68% JV
Southern California Housing Collaborative
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Mercy Housing Calwest
3% sole sponsor97% JV
Alpha Group
0% sole sponsor100% JV
PacH Anton South Holdings, LLC
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Santa Barbara Housing Assistance Corporation
46% sole sponsor54% JV
WCH Affordable III, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
No.CA Presbyterian Homes Services
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Ajax Development Services, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Housing Alliance II, Inc. dba Integrity
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Garden Court, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Terrex Development Corp.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
American Senior Living
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Project GO, Inc.
49% sole sponsor51% JV
Community Development L
0% sole sponsor100% JV
SADI, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Mission Housing Develop
23% sole sponsor77% JV
La Cienaga LOMOD
0% sole sponsor100% JV
LOMOD PDS, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
NFAHS Development LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Top cities by affordable units built
Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.
#1Los Angeles
587 projects
39,112 units
#2San Francisco
185 projects
18,181 units
#3San Jose
146 projects
17,446 units
#4Sacramento
130 projects
15,221 units
#5San Diego
150 projects
15,189 units
#6Oakland
85 projects
7,539 units
#7Fresno
65 projects
6,240 units
#8Bakersfield
54 projects
4,383 units
#9Long Beach
41 projects
4,289 units
#10Santa Rosa
50 projects
4,013 units
#11Anaheim
42 projects
3,766 units
#12Richmond
23 projects
3,323 units
Units in pipeline
Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).
Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,368
USA Multifamily Development, Inc.
2,328
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985
About this data
Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 775 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project. The headline totals (units, projects, pipeline) count each project once — JV projects are de-duplicated by TCAC application number — while the developer leaderboard credits every co-sponsor's involvement, so per-developer unit counts add up to more than the distinct statewide totals.
⚠ Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.
