Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 476500.

476
KDF Communities- San Bruno, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
226
units
477
Star Development, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
224
units
478
Site K Inc.
2 projects · 1 JVs
52% JV
223
units
479
GP/TODCO-A, Inc.
2 projects
0% JV
223
units
480
2nd Story Associates
6 projects · 6 JVs
100% JV+47 pipeline
221
units
481
Mid Peninsula Housing Coalition
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
221
units
482
ASIAN Inc.
5 projects · 2 JVs
64% JV
221
units
483
Central Valley Coaltion for Affordable Housing
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
220
units
484
National Farm Workers Service Center
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
219
units
485
Alliance Property Group, Inc.
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV+309 pipeline
219
units
486
Gong, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
218
units
487
Affordable Housing Paso Robles
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+78 pipeline
217
units
488
Pacific Southwest Development Corporation
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
217
units
489
Beacon Development Group
3 projects · 1 JVs
34% JV
216
units
490
Vista del Monte Affordable Housing, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
216
units
491
Holt Street Family Housing, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
216
units
492
SER Jobs for Progress, Inc.
3 projects
0% JV
214
units
493
ASOCIACION CAMPESINA LAZARO CARDENAS, INC.
3 projects · 2 JVs
56% JV
213
units
494
Spectrum GP LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+422 pipeline
213
units
495
SCPH dba be.group
3 projects · 1 JVs
20% JV
212
units
496
Housing Authority of City of S.B.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
212
units
497
AHA Sacramento II MGP, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
211
units
498
Security Properties
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
210
units
499
Professional Apt. Management, Inc.
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
207
units
500
W. Hollywood Comm. Hsg. Corp.
3 projects
0% JV
205
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 476500.

KDF Communities- San Bruno, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Star Development, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Site K Inc.
48% sole sponsor52% JV
GP/TODCO-A, Inc.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
2nd Story Associates
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Mid Peninsula Housing Coalition
0% sole sponsor100% JV
ASIAN Inc.
36% sole sponsor64% JV
Central Valley Coaltion for Affordable Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
National Farm Workers Service Center
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Alliance Property Group, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Gong, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Housing Paso Robles
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Pacific Southwest Development Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Beacon Development Group
66% sole sponsor34% JV
Vista del Monte Affordable Housing, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Holt Street Family Housing, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
SER Jobs for Progress, Inc.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
ASOCIACION CAMPESINA LAZARO CARDENAS, INC.
44% sole sponsor56% JV
Spectrum GP LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
SCPH dba be.group
80% sole sponsor20% JV
Housing Authority of City of S.B.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA Sacramento II MGP, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Security Properties
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Professional Apt. Management, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
W. Hollywood Comm. Hsg. Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.