Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 451475.

451
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+1,146 pipeline
252
units
452
TNDC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
252
units
453
MV Central Park Apartments, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
251
units
454
FFAH V City Lights, LLC
8 projects · 4 JVs
44% JV
250
units
455
Womens Organizing Resources, Knowledge and Service
3 projects · 2 JVs
64% JV
247
units
456
Bayside Communities LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
247
units
457
Christian Church Homes of No. CA
2 projects · 1 JVs
80% JV
246
units
458
Affordable Housing Alliance II, Inc.
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+121 pipeline
243
units
459
Mercy Charities Housing
4 projects · 1 JVs
23% JV
243
units
460
Ecumenical Association for Housing
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
241
units
461
CBM Group Inc
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
240
units
462
Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles
5 projects
0% JV
240
units
463
Burbank Housing Dev
3 projects · 1 JVs
27% JV
238
units
464
Community Development C
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
238
units
465
Affordable Multi-Family, LLC
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
237
units
466
RCC
5 projects · 5 JVs
100% JV
235
units
467
Clarum Corporation
3 projects · 1 JVs
56% JV
233
units
468
Hope Street Development Group, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
232
units
469
AHA MGP Los Angeles IX, LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
232
units
470
112 Alves Lane Inc
4 projects · 4 JVs
100% JV
230
units
471
The Southern CA Housing Dev. Corp.
2 projects
0% JV
229
units
472
of GP
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
228
units
473
Vacaville Community Housing
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
227
units
474
ABS Properties, Inc
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV+656 pipeline
227
units
475
Gateway Community Housing Corporation
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
227
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 451475.

JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
TNDC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
MV Central Park Apartments, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
FFAH V City Lights, LLC
56% sole sponsor44% JV
Womens Organizing Resources, Knowledge and Service
36% sole sponsor64% JV
Bayside Communities LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Christian Church Homes of No. CA
20% sole sponsor80% JV
Affordable Housing Alliance II, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Mercy Charities Housing
77% sole sponsor23% JV
Ecumenical Association for Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
CBM Group Inc
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Burbank Housing Dev
73% sole sponsor27% JV
Community Development C
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Multi-Family, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
RCC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Clarum Corporation
44% sole sponsor56% JV
Hope Street Development Group, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
AHA MGP Los Angeles IX, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
112 Alves Lane Inc
0% sole sponsor100% JV
The Southern CA Housing Dev. Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
of GP
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Vacaville Community Housing
0% sole sponsor100% JV
ABS Properties, Inc
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Gateway Community Housing Corporation
0% sole sponsor100% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.