Who's building affordable housing in California?

Track records for leading LIHTC developers — sourced from TCAC award data and enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports. SPV-unwound sponsor attribution.

Also see: Property manager rankings →

536,991
LI units built
6,631
TCAC projects
100,246
Units in pipeline
801
Developers tracked
248
Cities represented

Developer leaderboard

801 developers tracked — ranked by total low-income units built. Showing 701725.

701
Avenida Serra Housing Partners GP LLC
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
105
units
702
Oceanside Gardens, Inc.
3 projects · 1 JVs
75% JV
105
units
703
Women Organizing Resources, Knowledge and Services
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
105
units
704
Cabrillo EDC
2 projects
0% JV
104
units
705
AHA MGP RIV I, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
103
units
706
Skid Row Development Corporation
2 projects · 1 JVs
44% JV
101
units
707
Nexus Affordable Housing, LP
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
101
units
708
2112 Monterey Road, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
100
units
709
Housing Authority of the City of San Buenaventura
3 projects · 2 JVs
51% JV+134 pipeline
100
units
710
Hamilton Affordable Homes, Inc.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
100
units
711
Community Housing Sonoma County
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
98
units
712
Affordable Housing land Consultants
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
98
units
713
Southern CA Housing Development Corp.
2 projects
0% JV
98
units
714
JSCo Heritage Commons III LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
98
units
715
California Urban Investment Partners, LLC
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
97
units
716
Housing Authority of the County
3 projects · 3 JVs
100% JV
97
units
717
Kings County Management and Development Corporatio
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
97
units
718
Design Center Development Corp.
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
96
units
719
Cabrillo Economic Dev. Corp.
2 projects
0% JV
96
units
720
Women Organizing Resources, Knowldege and Services
3 projects · 2 JVs
69% JV
96
units
721
Danberg Development
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
95
units
722
Community Revitilization and Development
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
95
units
723
Wakeland Housign
2 projects
0% JV
95
units
724
#REF!
2 projects · 2 JVs
100% JV
93
units
725
Davis Mutual Housing Association
2 projects
0% JV
93
units

Development model breakdown

Share of units built as sole sponsor vs. joint venture — developers 701725.

Avenida Serra Housing Partners GP LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Oceanside Gardens, Inc.
25% sole sponsor75% JV
Women Organizing Resources, Knowledge and Services
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Cabrillo EDC
100% sole sponsor0% JV
AHA MGP RIV I, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Skid Row Development Corporation
56% sole sponsor44% JV
Nexus Affordable Housing, LP
0% sole sponsor100% JV
2112 Monterey Road, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Authority of the City of San Buenaventura
49% sole sponsor51% JV
Hamilton Affordable Homes, Inc.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Community Housing Sonoma County
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Affordable Housing land Consultants
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Southern CA Housing Development Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
JSCo Heritage Commons III LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
California Urban Investment Partners, LLC
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Housing Authority of the County
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Kings County Management and Development Corporatio
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Design Center Development Corp.
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Cabrillo Economic Dev. Corp.
100% sole sponsor0% JV
Women Organizing Resources, Knowldege and Services
31% sole sponsor69% JV
Danberg Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Community Revitilization and Development
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Wakeland Housign
100% sole sponsor0% JV
#REF!
0% sole sponsor100% JV
Davis Mutual Housing Association
100% sole sponsor0% JV

Top cities by affordable units built

Concentrated production across these California cities by the tracked developers.

#1Los Angeles
225 projects
15,017 units
#2San Jose
38 projects
4,917 units
#3San Diego
42 projects
3,793 units
#4San Francisco
37 projects
3,603 units
#5Sacramento
28 projects
2,650 units
#6Oakland
24 projects
1,943 units
#7Santa Rosa
28 projects
1,870 units
#8Chico
14 projects
1,122 units
#9San Marcos
12 projects
1,097 units
#10Fresno
16 projects
1,092 units
#11Fremont
12 projects
891 units
#12Palmdale
7 projects
797 units

Units in pipeline

Preliminary Reservation projects (awarded but not yet placed in service).

Pacific West Communities, Inc.
8,474
TPC Holdings IX, LLC
8,474
Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing
7,306
Riverside Charitable Corporation
2,984
Meta Housing Corporation
2,854
USA Multi-Family Development, Inc.
2,328
Community Revitalization and Development Corporation
2,276
Affirmed Housing Group, Inc.
2,143
PacH San Jose Holdings, LLC
2,104
CFAH Housing, LLC
1,906
Pacific Southwest Community Development Corporation
1,690
National Community Renaissance of California
1,673
Eden Housing, Inc.
1,582
Chelsea Investment Corporation
1,513
Las Palmas Foundation
1,464
Pacific Housing, Inc.
1,403
ROEM Development Corporation
1,265
CRP Affordable Housing
1,253
Mercy Housing California
1,187
MRK Partners, Inc.
1,167
JEMCOR Development Partners, LLC
1,146
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
1,140
Danco Communities
1,108
Community Development Partners
1,052
Corporation for Better Housing
985

About this data

Stats are derived from TCAC (California Tax Credit Allocation Committee) Low-Income Housing Tax Credit award records, enriched with HCD Annual Progress Reports (APR) joined on Assessor Parcel Numbers. Attribution uses SPV-unwinding — project-specific LLCs are collapsed into their controlling parent sponsors. "APR confirmed" units reflect buildings with a certificate of occupancy recorded in the HCD APR. Data covers 801 developers with 2+ built projects through 2025. "Pipeline" = Preliminary Reservation stage (TCAC award issued, project not yet placed in service). JV = joint venture where two or more independent sponsors share the tax credit project.

Scope: Primary source is TCAC LIHTC award data. It does not include affordable housing financed solely through HUD HOME loans, Section 8 project-based contracts, USDA Rural Development, local redevelopment funds, or bond financing without a tax credit award. Developers can submit non-TCAC projects via their dashboard; those verified by our team are included and marked self-reported in the leaderboard. Developers whose portfolios include a significant share of non-LIHTC affordable housing may still show lower counts than their own websites until those projects are submitted and approved.